Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69395/2021bail rejected

Prem Kumar Singh @ Tiger @ Prem Singh Tiger v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-16Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69395 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2018 Thana- AURAI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Prem Kumar Singh @ Tiger @ Prem Singh Tiger, aged about 44 years, S/o Late Yugal Kishor Singh R/o Village - Bhadai, P.S.- Hathauri, DistrictMuzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Prakash Shrarma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 16-11-2022 Heard Mr. Uday Prakash Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP').

2. The petitioner has moved the Court seeking bail in connection with Aurai PS Case No. 278 of 2018 dated 02.12.2018 instituted under Sections 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.

3. This is the second attempt for bail as earlier such prayer was rejected by order dated 14.07.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14229 of 2020.

4. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Court may direct for conclusion of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69395 of 2021(5) dt.16-11-2022 2/2 the trial.

5. Learned APP submits that the petitioner is accused in many heinous crimes for which cases have been lodged against him and trial is pending.

6. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and for reasons recorded in the order dated 14.07.2020 in Cr. Misc. No. 14229 of 2020 and the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for conclusion of the trial, the Court does not find any ground to allow the prayer for bail.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

8. However, let the trial be expedited and concluded within a period of one year from the date of communication of the order to the Court concerned subject to co-operation from the petitioner and his counsel.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) P. Kumar U T