Khadga Nath Mishra And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12111 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Khadga Nath Mishra son of Late Bal Krishana Mirhsra Resident Of Mohalla-Gautam Nagar, Gangjala, P.S-Saharsa, District-Saharsa,

2. Kishore Nath Jha son of Late Kirhsna Dutta Jha Resident Of MohallaChitragupta Nagar, Saharsa., P.S.-Saharsa, District-Saharsa.

3. Ranjana Jha D/O Late Sundar Kant Jha Resident Of Mohalla-Gangjalla, Saharsa, P.S-Saharsa, District- Saharsa.

4. Binod Kumar Jaiswal son of Late Chitra Narayan Chaudhary Resident Of Mohalla-Panchawati Chowk, Gangjalla, Saharsa, P.S-Saharsa, DistrictSaharsah.

5. Amar Nath Chaudhary, son of Late Kulanand Chaudhary Resident Of Mohalla-Professor Colony, Saharsa, P.S-Saharsa, District-Saharsa.

6. Sudhabala D/O Late Indra Raj Kumar, Resident Of Mohalla-Tiwari Tola, Saharsa, P.S-Saharsa, District-Saharsa.

7. Kumud Kumari D/O Sri Surendra Mishra Resident Of Mohalla-Vidyapati Nagar, Saharsa, P.S-Saharsa, District-Saharsa.

8. Anjana Pathak D/O Sri Ram Narayan Mishra Resident Of Mohalla-Naya Bazar, Saharsa, P.S-Saharsa, District-Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar , Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Human Resources Development, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

2. The B.N.Mandal University, Madhepura, Through Its Registrar.

3. The Vice-Chancellor, B.N.Mandal University, Madhepura.

4. The Registrar, B.N.Mandal University, Madhepura. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-05-2016 Sri Pramod Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, in presence of Sri Manish Dhari Singh, learned counsel for the respondent /B.N. Mandal University as well as learned AC to SC No. 12 submits that in the present writ petition the petitioners have prayed for directing the respondents to consider their cases for time bound promotion. However, during the pendency of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.12111 of 2011 (7) dt.09-05-2016 2/2 writ petition their claim has already been rejected. Accordingly, he makes a prayer for disposal of the present writ petition, so that, the petitioners if so advised, may assail the order of rejection of their claim.

The prayer is allowed.

The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty as indicated above.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U