← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49933/2015bail granted

Ajay Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2015-11-09Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49933 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -192 Year- 2009 Thana -GAYA GRP CASE District- GAYA ====================================================== Ajay Thakur, Son of Barho Thakur, Resident of Village- Karmauni, Police Station -Dobhi, District Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramashish, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 192 of 2009 registered for offences under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The Police, on secret information, constituted a team of S.T.F. and surrounded a place at Gaya Railway Station from where Rajesh Kumar and Dharmendra Kumar were arrested and from their possession incriminating articles were recovered. They were disclosed the name of petitioner and sneaked out the place of occurrence.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.07.2015 and there is no criminal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49933 of 2015 (2) dt.09-11-2015 2/2 history against him.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner Ajay Thakur, be released on bail on 2nd of December, 2015 on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Railway Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 192 of 2009, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vats/- U T