← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68585/2021withdrawn

Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-09Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68585 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2021 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== KUNDAN KUMAR @ KUNDAN SINGH S/o- Sri Mukesh Singh Resident of Village - Jaggu Bigha, P.S. - Fatuha, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sujit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.03.2021, is a person with clean antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. The informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to Chandan with his minor daughter, sixteen accused persons, including the petitioner, came to the house of the informant and on orders of Vinay Singh and Mukesh Singh, Kundan Singh (petitioner) fired causing injury on the head of the informant's wife who died.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68585 of 2021(2) dt.09-05-2022 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, fairly submits that petitioner is alleged to be the main assailant, trial has commenced and out of six witnesses, three witnesses have been examined including the informant, but all the three witnesses have been declared hostile.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the case of the petitioner is different from Binay Singh and Mukesh Singh as they were alleged to be order giver but this petitioner is alleged to be the main assailant.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application. Permission is accorded with a direction to the learned court below to ensure that the trial is completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

Further, the District Magistrate, Patna and the S.S.P., Patna are also directed to ensure that the official witnesses appear in the learned court below as and when required by the learned court below failing which it shall be presumed that the prosecution is being delayed at the instance of the official witnesses.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68585 of 2021(2) dt.09-05-2022 3/3 Let a copy of the order be sent to the District Magistrate, Patna and S.S.P., Patna forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T