Dasarath Sah @ Dashrath Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15090 of 2018 ====================================================== Dasarath Sah @ Dashrath Kumar, Son of Vishnu Sah, Resident of VillageGovind Fandah Riga, P.S.-Sitamarhi, District-Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, of the Excise Department, Bihar at Patna.

2. The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi.

4. The Excise Inspector, Excise Department, Sadar B Area, District-Sitamarhi.

5. The Officer In-Charge of Police Station, Sadar, District-Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Manish -SC-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 02-08-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (Auto) bearing Registration No. BR 30P, 6944, which has been seized in connection with Excise Case No. C2/369 of 2018 due to violation of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings, vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present case.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending

Patna High Court CWJC No.15090 of 2018(2) dt.02-08-2018 2/2 finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case, the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner on his furnishing two sureties to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Sitamarhi within a period of one week from the date of his furnishing the sureties and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the authority concerned and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case so as to cause adverse effect or prejudice to the State Government.

The valuation of the vehicle in question shall be done as per the valuation shown in the insurance document. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Sunil/-s.shukla U