Raj Narayan Rai @ Ranjan Gope v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74457 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-488 Year-2018 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
RAJ NARAYAN RAI @ RANJAN GOPE Son of Late Munshi Rai Resident of Village- Sultanpur Bhatha Par, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna. 2.
Kanti Devi Wife of Raj Narayan Rai @ Ranjan Gope Resident of VillageSultanpur Bhatha Par, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna. 3.
Neetu Kumari Daughter of Raj Narayan Rai @ Ranjan Gope Resident of Village- Sultanpur Bhatha Par, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna. 4.
Tinku @ Guddu Son of Raj Narayan Rai @ Ranjan Gope Resident of Village- Sultanpur Bhatha Par, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna. 5.
Rakesh @ Mirchai Gope Son of Raj Narayan Rai @ Ranjan Gope Resident of Village- Sultanpur Bhatha Par, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Diwakar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Danapur PS case no. 488 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 427, 323, 384, 379 of Indian Penal Code.
The allegation is regarding the accused persons i.e. the petitioners herein having had an altercation with the informant and his family members on account of previous land dispute and the accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant with legs and hands.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74457 of 2019(3) dt.28-11-2019 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as far as the petitioners are concerned, there is no specific allegation of any sort of overt act as against them and only general and omnibus allegations have been levelled. It is further submitted that admittedly, there is land dispute existing from before on account of which, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioners are having a clean antecedent.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and appropriate to admit the petitioners to the privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the abovenamed petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. 1st, Danapur in connection with Danapur PS case no. 488 of 2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U T