Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35097/2017dismissed

Ahana Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-02Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35097 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2095 Year- 2013 Thana -WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- WESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Ahana Gupta wife of Sri Girishkant Chaudhary @ Sunny, daughter of Sri Ambika Prasad, Resident of Marwari Mohalla, Ward No. 14, Narkatiaganj, P.S.- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Girishkant Chaudhary @ Sunny son of Nareh Chaudhary.

3. Naresh Chaudhary son of Sri Sagar Chaudhary, O.P. Nos 2 and 3 residents of Mohalla- Saraiyaganj, Sri Shyam Mandir Road, Pankaj Market, P.S.- Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is wife of Opposite party No.2. The Opposite party No.3 is father of Opposite party No.2. The said Opposite parties are accused for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code in Complaint case No. 2095-C of 2013 and have been allowed anticipatory bail by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, West Champaran at Bettiah. This application has been filed by the petitioner for cancellation of their bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has attempted to

impress upon me that certain observations made by the Court below while allowing the Opposite parties on anticipatory bail are incorrect and unwarranted.

I have perused the order. Whatever observation is there in the order are certainly tentative in nature.

No case for cancellation of bail is made out since apparently the dispute between the petitioner and Opposite party No.2 is basically matrimonial in nature.

This application has no merit and it is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U