Suryadeo Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16440 of 2022 ====================================================== Suryadeo Ram Son of Late Laxmi Ram Resident of Village- Kochadh, P.S.- Barun, Block- Baraun, District- Aurangabad, Bihar- 824112. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad. 3.
The District Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad. 4.
The Additional Collector, Aurangabad.
5.
The Circle Officer, Baraun, Aurangabad.
6.
The Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Railway, Government of India, New Delhi.
7.
The Railway Board through its Chairman, Ministry of Railway, Government of India, New Delhi.
8.
The Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited, through its Chairman 5th Floor, Pragati Maidan, Metro Station Building Complex, New Delhi- 110001.
9.
The Managing Director, Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited Chairman, 5th Floor, Pragati Maidan, Metro Station Building Complex, New Delhi- 110001.
10.
The General Manager, Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited, Mugalsarai Zone, Swarna Complex, 2nd Floor, Susuwahi, PostSusuwahi, Near Union Bank of India, P.S.- Lanka, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh221011. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pratik Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP-18 For the UOI :
Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, Sr. CGC Mr. Aditya Anand, Advocate For the Respondents No. 8, 9 and 10 :
Mr. Tiwari Shwetketu, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-12-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned GP-18 for the State, learned Sr. CGC appearing on behalf of the Union of India and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the DFCCIL.
Patna High Court CWJC No.16440 of 2022(2) dt.09-12-2024 2/2
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh with proper pleadings and necessary parties.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U