Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60921/2025dismissed

Suresh @ Loha @ Loha Singh @ Suresh Singh Bhogta v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-09Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60921 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-315 Year-2022 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Suresh @ Loha @ Loha Singh @ Suresh Singh Bhogta S/o- Sohar Singh Bhogta Village- Tilhe Tand Ps- Dhangai Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aman Vishal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 315 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 353, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Explosive Substance Act and Sections 16, 18, 20, 38 of the U.A.P. Act.

3. As per prosecution case, the allegation FIR named accused persons is that they planted many explosive substances to harm security forces. It is further alleged that upon search many explosive articles were recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60921 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 2/2 falsely been implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. The petitioner was not apprehended on the spot and he has no concern with the alleged occurrence. It is further submitted nothing incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious possession. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 22.04.2025 and he is accused in three more cases which are under UAP Act.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Considering the participation of the petitioner in the alleged offence and also considering the fact that the petitioner is a naxal and he is involved in anti-national activities, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U