Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/2287/2017disposed

Subhash Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-25Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2287 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4 Year- 2017 Thana -SC/ST District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Subhash Sah

2. Suresh Sah

3. Deo Kishore Sah. 1 to 3 son of Mahadeo Sah. null

4. Bechan Sah son of Late Khattar Sah.

5. Ram Prasad Sah son of Late Khattar Sah.

6. Chandra Kishore Sah son of Late Khattar Sah.

7. Sabury Sah son of Ram Nath Sah.

8. Ram Nath Sah @ Ramnath Sah, son of Late Jahru Sah.

9. Mohan Sah son of Dhauli Sah. null

10. Ram Chandra Sah son of Dhauli Sah. All resident of Village- Andauli, P.S. Kishanpur, District- Supaul.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Dinesh Choudhary For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sri Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-08-2017 Heard the parties.

The appellants seek pre arrest bail in connection with Supaul SC/ST P.S.Case No.4 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 379, 427, 447, 448, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3(1)(r)(s)(w)(i) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Allegation against the appellants is that the appellant thrown straws out of the house of the informant and also abused him by taking caste name.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2287 of 2017 (2) dt.25-08-2017 2/2 Submission of the learned counsel for the appellants is that prior to occurrence, informatory petition had been filed by the appellants as they were apprehending their implication in a false case and further submission is that they have been falsely implicated in this case and no such occurrence has taken place. Heard learned Special P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides, this appeal is not maintainable. Let the appellants surrender before the court of Special Judge and prayer for regular bail, which will be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court on the same may.

With the above observation, this appeal is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U