← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1892/2006disposed

Shubhendu Kumar Sinha And ORS v. State Of Bihar

2017-08-10The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1892 of 2006 ====================================================== (a) Shubhendu Kumar Sinha, son of late Raghvendra Kumar Sinha (b) Shikha Sinha, Daughter of late Raghvendra Kumar Sinha (c) Tulika Sinha, wife of Manjeet Kumar, daughter of late Raghvendra Kumar Sinha, resident of Mohalla- Maripur (d) Tanaja Sinha, wife of Awanish Kumar Sinha, daughter of late Raghvendra Kumar Sinha, resident of Purana Wairaha, Allahabad (e) Bhumika Sinha, wife of Dibya Praveen, daughter of late Raghvendra Kumar Sinha, resident of Dwarika, Delhi, at present resident of Mutauah Dahiawan Tola, P.O. Chapra Town District- Saran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, through its Registrar Shri Dr. Amjad Ali Khan

3. Shri Asheshwar Prasad Yadav, Vice Chancellor, Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur

4. Shri Dr. Amjad Ali Khan, Registrar, Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur

5. Jai Prakash University, Chapra, through its Registrar Shri Md. Gholam Mustafa.

6. Shri Jitendra Sinha, Vice Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra

7. Shri Bipin Bihari Prasad, Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahesh Narayan Parbat, Sr. Advocate For Bihar University : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For J.P. University : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Nagendra Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Keeping in view the show-cause filed by the respondents, for the present, no further action is required to be taken in the matter. However, in case the petitioners have any grievance still subsisting, particularly with regard to calculation and quantification of the benefit granted to them, liberty shall be available to the petitioners to take up the issue with the concerned

Patna High Court MJC No.1892 of 2006 (19) dt.10-08-2017 2/2 University by filing a representation and thereafter if still any grievance subsists, to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) P.K.P.

U