Santosh Keshari @ Santosh Kumar Keshari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41217 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -163 Year- 2014 Thana -CHAINPUR District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Santosh Keshari @ Santosh Kumar Keshari, son of Kamala Keshari, Resident of Village- Hatta, P.S. Chainpur, District Kaimur at Bhabua. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.163 of 2014, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation has been made that the son of the informant, who is the driver of Bolero Jeep, was going towards Kharigaon. In the mid-way, he was intercepted by the accused persons, assaulted mercilessly and later on, the son of the informant was thrown into the pond, but some how, he was saved. The police after investigation has submitted the chargesheet against six accused persons and also submitted the Final

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41217 of 2017 (2) dt.06-10-2017 2/2 Form in favour of the petitioner, but the Judicial Magistrate vide order dated 06.12.2016 has recorded that there are sufficient materials against this petitioner in the case diary and on that basis the Judicial Magistrate has taken cognizance against the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation is general and omnibus in nature and the Police submitted the Final Form in faovur of the petitioner as no any material was found against the petitioner.

Looking to the nature of allegation and the facts and circumstance of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. (Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T