Dharma @ Dharma Dom @ Ravi Domh @ Vickey @ Dharma Domh @ Vicky Domh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61453 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-381 Year-2023 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== Dharma @ Dharma Dom @ Ravi Domh @ Vickey @ Dharma Domh @ Vicky Domh S/o Late Manu Dohm @ Rajendra Domh R/o Village - Gewal Bigha, P.S - Rampur, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gaya Kotwali P.S. Case No. 381 of 2023 dated 13.06.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/s 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants are alleged to have looted two bags and one box containing Rs. 1,90,000/-, Aadhar card, Voter-ID card, clothes and an Apple Iphone on the point of pistol.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has sprung up during the course of the investigation. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61453 of 2025(2) dt.18-11-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 15.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42784/2025. The petitioner has seven criminal antecedents and he is on bail in all the aforesaid cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 02.05.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya in connection with Gaya Kotwali P.S. Case No. 381 of 2023, with the condition:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T