Nawlesh Sharma v. State Of Bihar And ANR
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52993 of 2016 (4) dt.19-05-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52993 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -670 Year- 2015 Thana -JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE DistrictJEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Nawlesh Sharma Son of Ravindra Sharma Resident of Village Newari P.S. Shakurabad District Jehanabad at present Mohalla Adarsh Nagar Iraki P.S. & District Jehanabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Pinki Kumari Wife of Nawlesh Sharma resident of Village Newari P.S. Makhdumpur District Jehanabad presently daughter of late Ramswarath Sharma, Village Dhangawan P.S. & District Jehanabad. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Paras Nath For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Trial No. 3255 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner happens to be the husband of the complainant is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the petitioner admits his marriage with the complainant and he is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full honour and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52993 of 2016 (4) dt.19-05-2017 dignity. Statement to that effect has been made in paragraph-6 of the petition. Hence, the petitioner deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of this petitioner and submitted that the there is allegation of torture and demand of dowry against the petitioner, who is husband of the complainant. Moreover, the reconciliation has not been succeeded between them Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail of this petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of this petitioner is, hereby, rejected. (Arvind Srivastava, J.) brajesh/- U