Chunnu Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62065 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2022 Thana- BARGAINIA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== CHUNNU ALAM Son of Md. Ganaur Ahamad Resident of Village - Dhaka, P.S.- Chiranya, District - Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-01-2023 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bairgania P.S. Case No. 181 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of 159 liter Nepali Saufi liquor from the Auto Rickshaw in question. The petitioner is apprehended on spot. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 21.06.2022. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has already been submitted in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62065 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023 2/3 the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. Learned counsel further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession or personal possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence as submitted, keeping in view clean antecedent of the petitioner and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Court, Court No. I, Sitamarhi in connection with Bairgania P.S. Case No. 181 of 2022, subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62065 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023 3/3 remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) alok/- U T