Jawahar Lal Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2174 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3610 of 1993 ====================================================== JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA SON OF LATE RAM PRASAD SAH. RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MANPUR, P.O.- DHOBHA BAZAR, P.S.- ARRAH MUFFASSIL, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR.

2. THE ADDITIONAL MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PATNA, BIHAR.

3. THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, ARRAH, DISTRICT BHOJPUR.

4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS, ARRAH, DISTRICTBHOJPUR.

5. RAMDHARI MAHTO SON OF RAM GULAM MAHTO. RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MANPUR, P.O.-DHOBHA BAZAR, P.S.- ARRAH MUFFASIL, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR.

6. KAMLESH UPADHYAY SON OF GOPALGJEE UPADHYAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MANPUR, P.O.- DHOBHA BAZAR, P.S.- ARRAH MUFFASSIL, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) 04-01-2018 There is a delay of 1 year and 195 days in preferring the appeal. The reason given is that the Advocate- on- Record did not appear and no information was given. In these days of technology, it is not an impossibility to track the status of the case. It is a sheer case of negligence on the part of the litigant. In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to condone the delay. The limitation petition is dismissed. As a

Patna High Court LPA No.2174 of 2016(8) dt.04-01-2018 2/2 consequence thereof, even the appeal stands dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) ( Nilu Agrawal, J) sk U