Bechan Sada v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49556 of 2015 (2) dt.10-12-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49556 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2015 Thana -BIHRA District- SAHARSA ======================================================
1. Bechan Sada Son of Nago Sada Resident of Village - Sihoul, P.S. - Bihra, District - Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar 1 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bihra P.S. Case No. 22 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 366A, 363A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, Sangeeta Kumari aged 15 years, the daughter of the informant, was kidnapped by the petitioner and his son with intention to marry with her.
Submission is of false implication and that the victim girl has given her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. wherein she has not stated anything against the petitioner and has denied regarding her kidnapping vide annexure-3.
Learned APP fairly submits that the victim has not
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49556 of 2015 (2) dt.10-12-2015 supported the allegation of kidnapping.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Bihra P.S. Case No. 22 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T