Ashok Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68890 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2024 Thana- Kanaria District- Saharsa ====================================================== Ashok Yadav, S/O Late Bindeshwari Yadav R/O Village- Ghoghsam, P.SKanaria, Distt.- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravi Ranjan Mallick, Advocate Mr. Kaushal Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP For the informant :
Mr. Aditya Raj, Advocate Mr. Mukesh Kumar Laldev, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 121, 121(A), 122, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5), 191(2), 191(3) and 190 of B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per prosecution case, the allegation is that after the victory in PACS election, the informant took out a victory procession and when the procession reached near the house of Kari Yadav, the F.I.R. named accused including this petitioner along with 10-15 unknown persons variously armed with deadly weapons started hitting the informant and when Jeewachh
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68890 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 2/2 Yadav came to rescue him, the petitioner hit him with Farsa on his head due to which he fell down on the ground.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to political rivalry. The doctor has found the injury simple in nature. There is case and counter case. Petitioner has got clean antecedent and is in custody since 15.06.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of custody, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sh. Chandan Thakur, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saharsa in connection with Kanaria P.S. Case No. 21 of 2024.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) P.K.P./- U