Rajdev Sahani v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Prohibition And Excise, Governme

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2121 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Jamui ====================================================== RAJDEV SAHANI S/o Nankhu Sahani, R/o 9B Road, Bokaro Steel City, P.S.- Harla, District- Bokaro (Jharkhand).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Department of Prohibition & Excise, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate Cum Collector , Jamui.

3. The Superintendent of Excise, Jamui.

4. The Sub Inspector Cum Incharge, Excise, Chakai, Jamui. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md.Imteyaz Ahmad For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha (Ga1) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 24-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner has prayed for release of the vehicle Tata Sumo (Four Wheeler) bearing registration no. JH09E-2437, which has been seized by the police in connection with Case No. 126C2 of 2018 (Confiscation Case No. 36 of 2018) District - Jamui, for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. It is alleged that 75 liters of illicit liquor have been recovered from the vehicle in question. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by the terms and conditions which may be imposed by this Court for provisional release of the vehicle in question.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.2121 of 2018(2) dt.24-09-2018 2/2 In view of the views expressed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, considering the quantity of the illicit liquor being more than 30 liters, pending initiation/finalization of confiscation proceeding, this Court would direct release of the vehicle in question on furnishing two sureties along with a bank guarantee for the value of the vehicle in question as indicated in the insurance document to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, Jamui. Apart from the above, the petitioner shall be obliged to submit an undertaking before the District Magistrate, Jamui that during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding he would not deal with the vehicle in question and shall not create any kind of encumbrance whatsoever and no third party right or interest shall be created. He would also undertake to produce the vehicle in question as and when required by the authority concerned. Let the vehicle be released within a week after submission of the two sureties along with the Bank Guarantee as indicated above.

The application stands disposed off.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T