Raju Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56962 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2024 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Raju Yadav S/o Late Baleshar Yadav @ Baleshwar Yadav R/o VillageChatani, P.S.- Rajouli, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-11-2025 Heard Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rajouli P.S. Case No. 46 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 337, 338, 379 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, all the accused persons including this petitioner brutally assaulted the informant by means of Tangi and lathi due to which he sustained serious injuries. There is further allegation of snatching of valuables against the accused persons.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner taking this Court through the FIR submitted that besides the omnibus nature of allegation against all the accused persons, eight in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56962 of 2025(3) dt.12-11-2025 2/3 number, the injury, which is allegedly sustained to the informant is concerned, the same is found to be simple in nature. The petitioner further submits that, in fact, on account of a dispute pertaining to drainage, a free fight has taken place resulting into unfortunate injury, however, the false implication of the petitioner being karta of the family cannot be ruled out. Learned Advocate for the petitioner further contended that though the petitioner is facing two criminal antecedents, but those cases are also on account of the pending land dispute between the parties.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that apart from the active participation of the petitioner, he is also facing two criminal antecedents over his head.

6. Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf the parties and considering the omnibus nature of allegation coupled with simple nature of injury, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Nawada, in connection

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56962 of 2025(3) dt.12-11-2025 3/3 with Rajouli P.S. Case No. 46 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (Harish Kumar, J) Pawan/- U T