← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./98/2015bail granted

Sheru Khan @ Md. Sheru Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2015-01-07Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.98 of 2015 (2) dt.07-01-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.98 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -153 Year- 2012 Thana -MAGADH UNIVERSITY District- GAYA ====================================================== Sheru Khan @ Md. Sheru Khan son of Asagar Ali Khan, R/o village- Mora Mardana, P.S.- Magadh University, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Sahni For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anita Kumari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 07-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected vide order dated 18.6.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24867 of 2014 on the ground that the petitioner has remained in custody since 31.10.2013 and in M.U. P.S. Case No. 145 of 2013 registered earlier against him, he has been admitted to bail and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned APP opposes.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the fact that in another case he has been admitted to bail and noticing the period of detention, the petitioner Sheru Khan @ Md. Sheru Khan is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.98 of 2015 (2) dt.07-01-2015 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Magadh University P.S. Case No. 153 of 2012, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T