Makshud Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62592 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2024 Thana- ADHAOURA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Makshud Khan S/o Sagir Khan R/o Village- Adhaura, P.S.- Adhaura, DistrictKaimur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Adhaura P.S. Case No.33 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 504, 353, 379, 307/34 of the IPC. 3.

As per the prosecution case, when the informant intercepted a Pickup van, then on the phone call of the person sitting in the Pickup van, petitioner and other co-accused persons came there being armed variously and brutally assaulted the informant and his driver.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence in the manner as alleged has ever

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62592 of 2024(2) dt.01-10-2024 2/2 taken place. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner and though the informant got grievous injury but the same has been caused during the altercation between the local people and the informant. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent and in one case, he has been acquitted.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that there is specific allegation against the petitioner and two injury of the injured were found grievous in nature. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the nature of injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T