Pinku @ Sheru @ Suraj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60885 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2017 Thana- KHAJEKALA District- Patna ====================================================== PINKU @ SHERU @ SURAJ Son of Tauhid Mistri @ Tauheed Khan Resident of Mohalla- Bag Kalu Khan in front of Mazar Gali, P.S.- Khajekalan, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Praveen Prabhakar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ramchandra Sahni ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-11-2019 Heard the parties.
Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court, vide order dated 7.11.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.46121 of 2017. Allegation against the petitioner is of firing on the son of the informant causing his death. It further appears that again the petitioner has moved before this Court and his prayer for bail was again rejected, vide order dated 3.10.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No.60152 of 2018. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is in custody for 2 1⁄2 years and up till now only one witness has been examined. .
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60885 of 2019(3) dt.06-11-2019 2/2 and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody for two years and nine months, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conduct it on regular basis so that it may be concluded as soon as possible. At the same time, the Sr.S.P., Patna is directed to produce the witnesses in the court on the date fixed so that the trial may be concluded.
With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T