← Library
Patna High CourtCOMP. APP.(DB)/2/2014disposed

Ex-Worker Of Rohtas Industries Ltd. v. Rohtas Industries Ltd.

2018-09-25Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad,Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Company Appeal (DB) No.2 of 2014 ====================================================== Ex-worker of Rohtas Industries Ltd (In liquidation) and its sister concern through its authorized representative Girija Nandan Singh @ G.N.Singh, son of Late Kapildeo Singh, resident of Quarter No. J/15 Dalmianagar, Rohtas. ... ... Appellant

Versus

Rohtas Industries Ltd. (In liquidation) through its Official Liquidator, Maurya Lok Complex, Bailey Road, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant :

Mr. Rakesh Narayan Singh For the Respondents :

Mr. Gautam Kejriwal Mr. Atal Bihari Pandey Mr. Alok Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN) 25-09-2018 Heard the parties.

The appellant is aggrieved by last paragraph of the order, by which the Official Liquidator was directed to personally visit Dalmianagar and find out not only the number of quarters, whether in occupation of workers or others or vacant, but also its present market value which can be fetched if at that point of time the property was put on auction. The appellant is Ex-workers of Rohtas Industries Ltd. claiming to be residing in the quarter.

However, that direction of the Court has decided nothing. The exercise is only to obtain the market value of the

Patna High Court COMP. APP.(DB) No.2 of 2014(14) dt.25-09-2018 2/2 quarter at that point of time. The appellant would not be precluded from raising his objection including that there should be order/direction in consonance with the findings of one man commission.

Accordingly, granting such liberty to the appellant, the appeal stands disposed of being premature as no tangible threat has been made on the claim of the appellant. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) ( Madhuresh Prasad, J.) Snkumar/- U