Rabindra Pandey And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47650 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -91 Year- 2015 Thana -KUCHAIKOTE District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Rabindra Pandey

2. Harendra Pandey, Both sons of Late Raj Ballabh Pandey

3. Tunna Pandey Son of Harendra Pandey

4. Dhanu Pandey @ Dhanu Kr. Pandey

5. Arjun Pandey, Both sons of Rabindra Pandey All residents of Village - Karmaini Gaji, P.S. - Kuchaikot, District - Gopalganj.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-10-2015 Heard Sri Satisch Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. Five petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Kuchaikot P.S. Case no.91/2015, registered for the offence under Section 307 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code, have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in this case, there was case and counter case. He further submits that during investigation, injuries were found simple in nature. It has also been argued that there was dispute in respect of a road and, as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47650 of 2015 (2) dt.15-10-2015 2/2 such, petitioners have been implicated falsely in the present case. I have perused the impugned order. On perusal of the impugned order, I do not find any ground for extending the privilege of anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed. (Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U