Lakshman Rajak v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2542 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -20 Year- 2017 Thana -SC/ST District- KATIHAR ====================================================== Lakshman Rajak, Son of Baijnath Rajak, Resident of Village- Sarauni Kala, P.S.- Bihariganj, District- Madhepura.

.... .... Appellant

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Md. Mohibul Haque, Son of Abdul Hanan.

3. Md. Jamil Akhtar, son of Abdul Latif.

4. Anjar Moulvi, Son of Akhtar Hussain.

5. Md. Taufique Alam @ Tauifque, Son of Abdul Hannan.

6. Md. Abbas, Son of Abdul Hannan.

7. Md. Matin, Son of Lal Mohammad. All are resident of VillageHathiyadira, P.S.:- Rautara, District- Katihar. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Mayank Bilochan For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-11-2017 This appeal has been filed for cancellation for pre-arrest bail granted to respondents Nos. 2 to 7 on the ground that they are threatening the appellant.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special P.P.

Submission of learned counsel for the appellant is that after granting pre-arrest bail the respondents have threatened the appellant and to that effect he has filed a petition before learned Judicial Magistrate but no action has been taken. From perusal of the record it appears that privilege of

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2542 of 2017 (4) dt.08-11-2017 2/2 pre-arrest bail has been granted by learned Special Judge in this case to respondents Nos. 2 to 7.

In such view of the matter, the appellant should first move before the learned Special Judge for cancellation of prearrest bail granted to respondents Nos. 2 to 7. With the said observation, this appeal is disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U