Renu Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36549 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -163 Year- 2015 Thana -BALIA District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Renu Devi W/o Ranjit Khalifa, R/o Village- Mathurapur, P.S.- Ballia, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 163 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 363, 366(A). 368, 370(A), 370(D), 372, 373, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of Immoral Traffic Act and Section 4 and 8 of POCSO Act.

Prosecution case is that police on information that accused persons running brothel house, raided the place and recovered two minor girls and arrested other co-accused persons and some of the accused persons including petitioner fled away. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she has falsely been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. Further the recovered girls in her statement recorded

under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has not named the petitioner. It has also been submitted that other co-accused having similar allegation has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.08.2016 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 32603 of 2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and as other co-accused having similar allegation has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, let the petitioner above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -I, Begusarai, in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 163 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, this is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make herself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on her part two appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of her bail bonds.

It is also made clear that if during the investigation any incriminating and serious material comes against the petitioner, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of her bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T