Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61360/2024bail granted

Md. Sakir v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-26Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61360 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2024 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Sakir Son of Mansur Ali R/o Lakshnipur Bhagwati, ward No. 10, P.S.- Srinagar, Distt.- Madepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in para 1 and prayer portion of the bail petition in course of the day.

3. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024 dated 20.04.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 399, 402, 414, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 and 27 of the Arms Act.

4. As per the prosecution case, two country made pistols were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. One motorcycle was also recovered from the place of occurrence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61360 of 2024(3) dt.26-10-2024 2/2

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 21.04.2024.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Araria in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T