Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kanna @ Ajay Kana v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54827 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2019 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== AJAY KUMAR @ AJAY KANNA @ AJAY KANA Son of Vijay Ram Resident of Ambedkar Colony, Sandalpur, Police Station- Sultanganj, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2020 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sulganganj P.S. Case No. 31 of 2019, registered for offences punishable under Sections 307 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 /4 of the Explosive Substance Act. Earlier the petitioner happened to be the informant of the present case and it is alleged that when he has gone to ease out, there was explosion and he received injury in the said explosion. It appears that later on the petitioner was made accused as he himself was carrying the explosive, which exploded causing injuries to him.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has been in custody for one year and uptil now no substantial progress has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54827 of 2019(4) dt.08-01-2020 2/2 made in trial.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that there is recovery of chemicals from the house of the petitioner and apart from that he is accused in one more case of Arms Act.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, at this stage, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. However, if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T