← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40342/2012dismissed

Anil Kumar Mandal v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-04-16Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40342 of 2012 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -119 Year- 2012 Thana -null District- KATIHAR =========================================================== Anil Kumar Mandal, son of Shyamlal Mandal, resident of Village-Dhamkol, P.S.- Dandkhora, District-Katihar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Padma Devi, daughter of Baidyanath Mandal, resident of village-Madhepura, P.S.-Mufassil, District-Katihar. .... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jharkhand Upadhyay, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

By filing instant application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 26.6.2012 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Katihar in C.A. No. 119 of 2012 whereby he has taken cognizance for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

From a bare perusal of the complaint, it would appear that the petitioner being husband of the complainant subjected his

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40342 of 2012 dt.16-04-2015 2 / 2 wife to cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. The allegation made in the complaint has been supported by the complainant while being examined on oath. The other three witnesses examined on behalf of the complainant in course of inquiry have also supported the allegation made in the complaint. Considering the materials available on the record, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

I find no illegality in the impugned order. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

However, the petitioner may raise all the points available to him at the stage of framing of charge. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T