Sikandar Manjhi @ Sikandra Majhi v. The State Of Bihar
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69031 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-405 Year-2021 Thana- CHANPATIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Sikandar Manjhi @ Sikandra Majhi S/o Sukdeo Manjhi Resident of VillageKharg Pokhariya, Mushari Tola, P.S.- Chanpatia, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nand Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 405 of 2021 registered for the offence under sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) mdrashid/- U T