Patna High CourtCWJC/16709/2015disposed

Vijay Nandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-05-05Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16709 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Vijay Nandan Singh, Son of Late Basudeo Singh C/o Sri Ramadhar Singh, Sharda Bhawan, Pali Road Dehri-on-Sone, District- Rohtas .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. Magadh University, Bodh Gaya through its Registrar.

5. The Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

6. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

7. The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For Magadh University : Mr. Girijish Kumar For the State : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, SC 32 Mr. Kundan Kumar, AC to SC 32 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-05-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Magadh University, and learned Standing Counsel No. 32 for the State of Bihar. The petitioner retired as Laboratory Technician, while serving in A. N. S. College, Nabinagar, Aurangabad, a constituent unit of Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, with effect from 31.10.2005. He has a grievance that though he was getting regular pension from the date of his superannuation, but from July, 2010 onwards, no dearness allowance is being added to the petitioner's entitlement for pension. It is also his case that his pension was required to be revised with effect from 01.01.2006, which has so far not been done.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16709 of 2015 dt.05-05-2016 2/2 Mr.

Sunil Kumar Singh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the action of the respondents is arbitrary and without any valid reason. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the University has submitted that the petitioner has filed a representation to the Vice Chancellor of the University, on 23.03.2015, which has been brought on record by way of Annexure 3 to this writ application. He submits that the said representation shall be duly considered.

Considering the pleadings on record and submissions made on behalf of the parties, this application is disposed of with a direction to the Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, to finalize the claim of the petitioner, as raised in his said representation, dated 23.03.2015 (Annexure 3), and ensure payment of all admissible dues accordingly, within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before him. If any claim raised by the petitioner is not found admissible by the Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, he will be obliged to record reasons, therefor. Prabhakar Anand/- (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N. A.

Uploading Date 10.05.2016 Transmission Date N. A.