Patna High CourtCWJC/20145/2016disposed

Manibhushan Pratap Sengar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-03The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20145 of 2016 ===========================================================

1. Manibhushan Pratap Sengar, s/o Jitendra Kumar Singh, resident of MohallaPremji Colony, Kharaunia Bagicha, Agamkuan, P.S.- By- Pass+District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Chief Secretary, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Patna.

4. The Chief General Member Project, Bihar Medical Services and Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Patna.

5. The General Manager Project, Bihar Medical Services and Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Patna.

6. The Managing Director, Bihar Medical Services and Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Patna.

7. The Managing Project, Bihar Medical Services and Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Patna.

8. The District Magistrate, Betiah.

9. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Dubey, AC to AAG 11 For BMSCIL : Sri Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate.

Sri P.K. Singh, Advocate.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 03-11-2017 In the matter of allotment of construction work by BSMICL to various construction agencies pointing out the illegality this writ petition has been filed.

From the materials available on record, it is seen that the dispute in question arises out of construction work to be allotted to an appropriate agency and there is no legal issue involved in the matter.

Patna High Court CWJC No.20145 of 2016 dt.03-11-2017 In view of the above, we are not inclined to make indulgence into the matter.

If the petitioner is aggrieved with the impugned action he may take up the issue by filing appropriate application/representation before the State Vigilance authorities such as Lokayukta. With the aforesaid liberty this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) KKSINHA/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 09.11.2017 Transmission Date NA