Munna @ Munna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47128 of 2015 (2) dt.02-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47128 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -149 Year- 2015 Thana -WARSALIGANJ District- NAWADA ====================================================== Munna @ Munna Kumar, s/o Parmanand Singh, r/o vill- Sorhipur, P.S.- Warsaliganj, Distt.- Nawada.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 02-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Warsaliganj P.S. Case No. 149 of 2015.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated only on the confessional statement of coaccused Vikash Kumar and without any specific accusation of the petitioner having cheated anyone. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the house of the petitioner.
4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47128 of 2015 (2) dt.02-11-2015 date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.C. Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Nawada, in connection with Warsaliganj P.S. Case No. 149 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions :
(i) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U T