← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15861/2010dismissed

Smt.Sonia Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-25Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15861 of 2010 =========================================================== Smt. Sonia Jha W/O Binod Kumar Jha, resident of Mohalla - Ashok Nagar, Road No.- 1A, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Distt. & Town- Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Patna Regional Development Authority (Since Dissolved) through Town Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Bihar, Patna

3. Director Urban Planning, Bihar, Patna

4. Executive Engineer, Regional Development Authority (Since Dissolved), Bihar, Patna

5. Circle Officer, Patna Sadar, Patna

6. Manoj Kumar, Architect, Patna Regional Development Authority (Since Dissolved), Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Brajesh Kumar, AC to AAG-4 For respondent no. 7 : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-01-2018 Heard Mr. Bimal Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Brajesh Kumar, learned AC to AAG-4 for the State and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for private respondent no. 7. 2.

In the present writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is against the interlocutory order dated 08.05.2010 passed by the Town Commissioner, Patna Regional Development Authority,

Patna High Court CWJC No.15861 of 2010 dt.25-01-2018 2/2 Bihar, Patna in Case No. 9B of 2010 by which the petitioner has been directed not to make any construction over her land without permission and file her written notes of arguments within one week. 3.

In the opinion of this Court, the writ petition is premature, as no final order has been passed in the case and showcause notice issued to the petitioner is not without jurisdiction. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

4.

However, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise all her points before the authority concerned in the matter and if final order also goes against her, she may challenge the same in accordance with law before the appropriate forum. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Kanchan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date26.01.2018 Transmission Date NA