Saurav Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57907 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2024 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Saurav Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar S/O Mahendra Rai @ Mahendra Ray R/O Village- Darha, Than Singh, Ward No. 02, Bakhri Bazar, P.S.- Bakhri (Bakhari), District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of BIhar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bakhri (Bakhari) P.S. Case No. 294 of 2024 dated 23.07.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 317(4), 317(2), 111(7) read with Section 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, a stolen motorcycle was recovered from the house of the accused persons named in the F.I.R. It is further alleged that the petitioner along with the coaccused persons is involved in the business of dealing with the stolen motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57907 of 2025(2) dt.14-11-2025 2/2 petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the coaccused, Suraj Kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 24.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12200 of 2025. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 03.05.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Begusarai in connection with Bakhri (Bakhari) P.S. Case No. 294 of 2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T