Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69027/2021bail rejected

Ramji Rai @ Ramji Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69027 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2021 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ramji Rai @ Ramji Yadav Son of Late Bhola Rai Resident of Village - Khairawa, P.S. - Madhuban, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Madhuban P.S. Case No. 193 of 2021, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, this petitioner along with co-accused persons committed murder of the daughter of informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry by pressing her neck. Petitioner happens to be the husband of deceased.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence has ever taken place and there was no demand of dowry by the petitioner. In the fact, the deceased committed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69027 of 2021(3) dt.21-04-2022 2/2 suicide as she was mentally depressed because she was issuless. There is general and omnibus allegation and no specific allegation has been attributed against this petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2021 having no criminal antecedent. Learned APP however, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts aforesaid and the nature of allegation and the fact that petitioner is husband of the deceased and deceased died in unnatural circumstance at her matrimonial home, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U