Kari Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 58148 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2022 Thana- JALE District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

KARI YADAV SON OF LATE HEERA YADAV R/V- KHORIYA TOLA, P.S.- JALLEY, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA 2.

POONAM DEVI WIFE OF KARI YADAV R/V- KHORIYA TOLA, P.S.- JALLEY, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA 3.

RAMDEV YADAV SON OF LATE RAMA YADAV R/V- KHORIYA TOLA, P.S.- JALLEY, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA 4.

SHYAM KUMAR YADAV SON OF JAY RAM YADAV @ JAYJAY RAM YADAV R/V- KHORIYA TOLA, P.S.- JALLEY, DISTRICTDARBHANGA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Braj Kishore Pd., A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleges that his daughter aged 18 years was married on 20-04-2022 and on 03-05-2022 came back to her parental home and became traceless on 9.05.2022, further on enquiry came to know that Pappu Yadav abducted her with the help of petitioners.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 58148 of 2022(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no. 2 is a woman and have been falsely implicated in the present case being father, mother and cousin brothers of Pappu Yadav, it is also submitted that the victim came back and her statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. wherein she has not supported the case of the prosecution rather has stated that she was in love with Pappu and fled with him on her own sweet will. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jalley P.S. Case No. 64 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T