Soni Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.40214 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2017 Thana -AKBARNAGAR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Soni Devi, W/o Pankaj Kumar,
2. Rupam Devi W/o Pramod Kumar, Both are R/o Village- Sri Rampur, P.S.- Akbar Nagar, District- Bhagalpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 01-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Akbar Nagar P.S. Case No. 34 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that petitioners are ladies. They were not present at the place of occurrence.
In the written report, there is specific allegation against Pankaj, Pramod and Rajeev of causing fire-arm injury to the father of the informant.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40214 of 2017 (2) dt.01-09-2017 of the like amount each in connection with Akbar Nagar P.S. Case No. 34 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Ist, Bhagalpur subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T