Jahid Ansari @ Md. Jahid Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48473 of 2015 (2) dt.02-12-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48473 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -169 Year- 2015 Thana -DUMRA District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Jahid Ansari @ Md. Jahid Ansari Son of Md. Samsul Haque Resident of village - Kokana, P.S. Dumra, District - Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.Dayal (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 169 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections341, 323, 354, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 12 of POCSO Act.

Allegedly, when the informant, a student of class X, was returning from tuition centre with her friend Poonam Kumari, the petitioner and two other FIR named accused chased her by motorcycle and at the point of pistol surrounded her and started to tease her and further snapped her photograph in their mobile causing threats to defame her and further caused threats to commit blood shed with her family members.

Submission is of false implication and that now good

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48473 of 2015 (2) dt.02-12-2015 sense has prevailed between the parties and joint compromise petition has been filed in the court below which is evident from the impugned order itself. The petitioner is suffering in custody since 17.08.2015.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner and others are habitual in teasing the girls. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of detention and further considering that good sense has prevailed, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge I-cum- Special Judge, Sitamarhi in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 169 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T