Sudarshan Chaubey v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40522 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -876 Year- 2013 Thana -AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Sudarshan Chaubey .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh For the State : Mr. Smt. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 07-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Complaint Case No. 876 of 2013 instituted for the offence under Sections-406, 467, 468, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the petitioner was the branch manager in the bank and has retired from service. The informant has purchased the aforesaid tractor in the year, 2008 and the instant case has been lodged on 03-09-2013 when the tractor met with an accident. The complainant got the sale letter and on the basis of sale letter to get registration, Insurance Certificate at his own cost. The complainant did not get the vehicle registered and insured in time and when the tractor met with an accident, then he filed this Complaint Case making allegation against the petitioner.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40522 of 2017 (2) dt.07-09-2017 2/2 of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Complaint Case No. 876 of 2013 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Aurangabad subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T