← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58399/2025allowed

Ravi Kishan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-19Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58399 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1141 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ravi Kishan Son of Ashok Sah Resident of Village - Ambariya, P.S.- Shikarganj, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Mayank Prasanna Dubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per prosecution case, during course of patrolling, two motorcycle riders were intercepted and on search, 45 litres illicit liquor was recovered from Glamour motorcycle. Petitioner and other co-accused were arrested on the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case merely on suspicion. Petitioner is not the owner of the seized motorcycle. Nothing has been recovered from conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58399 of 2025(3) dt.19-09-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor. Petitioner had no knowledge about the alleged recovery. Similarly situated co-accused, Lav Kumar has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 11.09.2025 passed in Cr.Misc.No.59807 of 2025. Petitioner is in jail since 17.07.2025 having no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions of the parties and period of custody, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.02, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Motihari Excise P.S. Case No.1145 of 2025. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U T