Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69182 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2020 Thana- KISHUNPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== MANOJ YADAV S/o Satto Yadav R/o Village- Nawabakhar, P.S.- Kishanpur, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Masoom Alam, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Kumar Goutam, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is accused in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 25 of 2020 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 3107 of 2021 on 15.06.2021. Petitioner is under custody since 28.09.2020. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that earlier prayer of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69182 of 2021(3) dt.02-02-2022 2/2 the petitioner for bail was rejected by this Court on merit on 15.06.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. 3107 of 2021. Now, there is no fresh ground to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is again rejected. The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of six months.

utkarsh/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T