Arnav Kumar Jain v. The Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17077 of 2019 ====================================================== Arnav Kumar Jain S/o Shatrughan Sharma R/o Mananpur, P.S-Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through its Ministry of Human Resources Development. 2.
Secretary, Ministry of Human Resources Development, Govt. of India, Bahadurshah Jafar Marg, New Delhi, 3.
Bar Council of India through its Chairman/Secretary, Bar Council Bhawan, New Delhi.
4.
Chairman, bar Council of India, 21, Rouse Avenue Institutional Area, Near Bal Bhawan, New Delhi-2.
5.
Secretary, Bar Council of India, 21 Rouse Avenue Institutional Area, Near Bal Bhawan, New Delhi-2.
6.
Central University of South Bihar through its Vice-Chancellor, SH-7, Gaya Panchanpur Road, Karhara, P.S.-Tekari, District-Gaya. 7.
Vice Chancellor, Central University of South Bihar, Sh-7, Gaya Panchanpur Road, Karhara, P.S.-Tekari, District-Gaya.
8.
Registrar, Central University of South BIhar, SH_7, Gaya Panchanpur Road, Karhara, P.S.-Tekari, District-Gaya.
9.
Controller of Examination, Central University of South Bihar, Sh-7, Gaya Panchanpur Road, Karhara, P.S.-Tekari, District-Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate For Central University :
Mr. S.D. Sanjay (Ad.SG) Mr. Alok Kumar Agrawal, Advocate Ms. Priya Gupta, Advocate Mr. Mohit Agrawal, Advocate For UOI :
Mr. Kanak Verma, CGC For Bar Council of India:
Mr. Vishwajet Kumar Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 21-08-2019 A copy of the order dated 29.7.2019 produced by the counsel for the Bar Council of India is taken on record. In view of the order dated 29.07.2019 passed by the Bar Council of India and the stand taken by them, the present
Patna High Court CWJC No.17077 of 2019(2) dt.21-08-2019 2/2 writ petition has practically lost its relevance. The Bar Council of India has approved the decision of the Government of India for grant of 10% reservation in favour of the economically weaker section.
In view of the above, Annexures 8 and 9 have become ineffective since the petitioner has already taken admission and pursuing course.
With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U