Ravi Shekhar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41995 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2716 Year- 2015 Thana -MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Ravi Shekhar son of Sri Rajvanshi Shah residence of Mohalla Jai Prakash Nagar, Road No. 4, Bairiya, P.S. - Ahiyapur, District - Muzaffarpur, Bihar, (at present address), permanent address Village Mahmada, P.O. - Mahmada, P.S. - Barura, District - Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Summi Devi wife of Ravi Shekhar, D/o Ram Prasad Gupta resident of village - Goraiya, P.S. - Kurhani, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjayu Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 2716 of 2015 for the offence instituted under Sections 323, 406, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He has falsely been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41995 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 2/2 implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 2716 of 2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., East Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T