Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35339/2017bail granted

Sushil Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-05Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35339 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2017 Thana -BHAGWANGANJ District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Sushil Kumar, Son of Late Awdhesh Yadav.

2. Ramni Devi, W/o Late Awdhesh Yadav. Both are residents of VillageNoniyarichak, P.S. Bhagwanganj, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 05-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Bhagwanganj P.S. Case No. 06 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-304B of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 are Debar and mother-in-law of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bhagwanganj P.S. Case No. 06 of 2017 to the satisfaction of Sri Ranjay Kumar, learned Judicial

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35339 of 2017 (3) dt.05-09-2017 Magistrate, Masaurhi, Patna subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T