← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45347/2017disposed

Sudesh Bhuiyan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-06Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45347 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2017 Thana -MADANPURA District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Sudesh Bhuiyan, Son of Late Mugeshwar Bhuiyan,

2. Dharkshan @ Dharachhan Bhuiyan, Son of Late Mugeshwar Bhuiyan.

3. Awadhesh Bhuiyan @ Awadhesh Kumar.

4. Ritesh Bhuiyan @ Ritesh Kumar, Both Sons of Dharkshan @ Dharachhan Bhuiyan,

5. Surendra Bhuiyan,

6. Krishna Bhuiyan, Both sons of Sudesh Bhuiyan, All resident of VillageMain Bigha, P.S. Madanpur, District- Aurangabad.

7. Dhananjay Bhuiyan, Son of Raja Ram Bhuiyan, Resident of VillageCharaiya, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhuranand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 06-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Madanpur P.S.Case No.147 of 2017 registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 308, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. The petitioners have clean antecedent. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground of direct allegation of assault against petitioners

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45347 of 2017 (5) dt.06-12-2017 2/2 no.1, 3 and 7.

In that view of the matter as well as facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners no.1,3 and 7. The prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners no.1, 3 and 7 are rejected. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners No.2, 4, 5 and 6 be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Aurangabad, in Madanpur P.S.Case No.147 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Arvind Srivastava, J) AnilKrSinha/- U