Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58839/2025bail granted

Raja Kumar @ Raja Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-30Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58839 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2025 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Raja Kumar @ Raja Kumar Yadav S/O Arjun Yadav Resident of villageKorahiya, P.S.- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 63/2025 (G.R. Case No. 287 of 2025) dated 05.03.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 274, 275, 317(5) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 630 litres of illicit Nepali country-made liquor was recovered from the four motorcycles.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner was disclosed by the co-accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58839 of 2025(2) dt.30-08-2025 2/2 persons. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel has submitted that the petitioner is not the owner of the seized motorcycles. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The coaccused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 16.06.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35864/2025. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.07.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 63/2025 (G.R. Case No. 287 of 2025).

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T