← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57454/2025disposed

Md. Arman @ Sams Tabrej v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57454 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2023 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== Md. Arman @ Sams Tabrej S/O Md. Parvez R/O Village- Chandhour, Rahim Tola, P.S.- Ujiyarpur, Dist.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surya Narayan Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 19-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The prayer for bail of the petitioner has earlier been rejected vide order dated 15.05.2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 26685 of 2024 granting liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail one year after framing of charge.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 12.09.2025, the petitioner was directed to file a supplementary affidavit bringing on record substantial proof to show that he is not absconding in any of the cases pending against him, which are eight in number. The said affidavit has not been filed till date. Once again, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks further time to file the same, submitting that he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57454 of 2025(5) dt.19-12-2025 2/2 has not received any instructions from the petitioner.

4. This matter has been pending since September, 2025 and despite sufficient opportunity having been granted to the petitioner to file the said supplementary affidavit, the same has not been filed till date.

5. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that keeping the present application pending any further would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No. 336 of 2023, pending before the learned JM 1st Class, Samastipur, is hereby rejected.

6. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail as and when he is in a position to apprise this Court about the status of the pending cases against him. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U T