Niranjan Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45873 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -274 Year- 2016 Thana -GHOSI District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Niranjan Sharma .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Ghosi P.S. Case No. 274 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections-304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased. The husband is in custody. From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Ghosi P.S. Case No. 274 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45873 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017 2/2 the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T